Our Hottest Takes About 2022 LGBTQ+ TV and Film

Autostraddle is not generally a HOT TAKES publication. If we’re going to write clickbait, it’s usually going to be Vapid Fluff because we know how nosy y’all are because of how nosy we are! But that doesn’t mean we don’t have hot takes. We’re just smart enough to keep them to ourselves or inside our group chats. But, oh ho — not today! Today you’re getting our entire team’s spiciest takes about 2022 LGBTQ+ TV and film, something I was only able to convince people to participate in because Nico said we could put them behind the A+ paywall as a gift. We really want to hear your takes too, in the comments.


Heather Hogan, TV Team Editor

In my younger life, back when I was still pretending to be straight in the early aughts, I was a hardcore Bette and Tina shipper. I frequented Tibette forums, I scoured the internet for Tibette spoilers, I read fan fiction, I made fan videos. I didn’t actually relate to them at all, but they were the first serious longterm lesbian couple I ever saw on TV and so, in some weird way, I imprinted on them like a closeted baby duck. I dreamed my days and nights away imagining a world where I, too, could one day be brave and cool enough to share my life with another woman.

Somewhere along the line, well before the original The L Word ended, I finally came out and really started living. When Gen Q arrived, and Bette and Tina were still out here doing the old stuff they’d always been doing, to each other and everyone around them, it actually made me really angry. While they were away, I had done the very, very, very hard work of growing up. Of figuring out my shit. Of unpacking and processing and addressing the behaviors that hurt the people around me. I took responsibility for myself. I worked hard to grow into a better, more mature person. I became, in my own middle age way, a queer elder. I take that role very seriously. And they hadn’t done any of that! They were my couple idol when I was just a tiny gay and I outgrew them! Way, way, way outgrew them! And I feel a kinda shocking amount of resentment about it.

I think The L Word is one of the most crucial and revolutionary pieces of media ever made. I think Jennifer Beals and Laurel Holloman have a rare and crackling chemistry. And I also think The L Word and Tibette have given countless queers a very unhinged understanding of what a healthy relationship looks like, and also plenty of excuses not to do the hard work of growing up. I can’t even begin to tell you how many people I’ve seen write off their very worst behavior as “oh just Shane stuff” and “oh but we’re just like Tibette.” We deserve better fictional adults in our lives.


Darcy, Writer

Listen up, fruits! So I know we all watched — and loved — A League of Their Own. Watching the pilot, I immediately fell truly, madly, deeply in love with the whole entire thing. Every character was perfection. And from that first moment when Greta offered to cut Carson’s hair, I was invested in their relationship. That first “thought so” took my breath away. There’s just nothing as intoxicating as a coming-out affair!!!

That said, I truly don’t believe that Carson and Greta should be endgame.

The thing about Greta… well, she’s Carson’s first. She’s strong and she’s glamorous and she’s exciting and she’s also very human. She’s Janet, if Janet was very much a girl. She knows things. She’s been here a minute. She’s whole.

Then we have Carson, who only learned about ten seconds ago that it was okay to want things. Carson, who went after baseball — who ran after that train like her life depended on it, because it probably did — but this is also the Carson who, before baseball, had never been kissed by someone like Greta in her whole entire life. This is the Carson who used to read love stories with no great love in them, because she could relate. This is the Carson who has lived her whole life in black and white, and now abruptly fallen into Greta’s technicolor land of Oz.

And it’s perfect. It’s sweet, and it’s sharp, and it’s powerful. It’s everything it should be.

But Greta knows who she is. Carson is only just beginning. I think they have to end so that Carson can learn more about herself, more about her world, more about how she wants to live and who she wants to be. I think that without definitive time apart, without real independent growth, Carson will just start following Greta around like Jo used to do (only with a lot more kissing), and then neither Carson nor Greta will be able to truly grow as people. I think Carson needs to stretch her wings, and I think Greta needs some time without a close companion in her life.

And hey: maybe in five years, they learn: they were the loves of each other’s lives all along. Maybe, someday, they drive the car they first snogged in away from their wedding, cans clanging, streamers dancing in the wind. Maybe! But for now, I think they both have some growing to do.


Tracy Levesque, Web Developer

I binged Warrior Nun in two days and I want a partial refund. I have some friends in the world of queer TV fandom whose opinions I really trust. If they are hype for a show, I’ll probably like it too. They, and the rest of the wlw-TV-lovingverse were really into Warrior Nun so I assumed I would love it too. I did not.

There were a lot of things I liked about it. The ass-kicking nuns were great. I’m also into the “Reluctant hero who doesn’t know she’s a hero and has to figure it out” trope. I loved Ava and, yes, she did have amazing chemistry with Beatrice, but I wanted more. I don’t do well with supernatural dramas; the plots are really hard for me to follow, but if a ship is great I can focus on that and stay somewhat confused by the rest. But this, IMO, was an excruciatingly slow burn with a crumb of a payoff at the end. It really reminded me of what TV was like for queer fans ten years ago — messing with us just enough to keep us hanging in and then tossing us one kiss before everything ends.

If the show gets a season three I may change my opinion, but until then, I’ll just be happy for everyone else who loved the show.


Katie, Writer

So this fully started as a joke that I made in our staff Slack but then I thought about it and I would definitely watch this. Ryan Murphy and Shonda Rhimes should collaborate. At first I was full joking because they’re both essentially the powerhouse names of TV in the last decade and each scored Netflix deals for absurd amounts of money. So what is Netflix just kind of said how about one mini series together? I mean yes there are some really horrific versions of this like the musical episode of Grey’s Anatomy where absolutely no one needed to be singing could become an entire show. Or all of the dead characters on Grey’s (and there are A LOT) become some sort of demon zombie horror story.

BUT. There is one version of this collaboration idea that actually has the potential to be really good. Ryan Murphy was partially responsible for the true crime series American Crime Story which had some really strong moments. I really enjoyed the season focused on Monica Lewinsky and how it helped bring that conversation into a new era post-MeToo to make it really clear that Monica was the victim. I could see Murphy’s true crime pairing really well with some of Shonda’s work like Scandal and How to Get Away with Murder. Who are the real life badass women like Olivia Pope whose stories of fighting for justice while occasionally maybe sleeping with a president and rigging and election need to be told? Because that is a show I would watch.


Ro, Sex & Dating Editor

I have a queer take on an aggressively straight TV show: Gabby and Rachel from The Bachelorette should have ended up together at the end of Season 19. No, neither Gabby nor Rachel has ever indicated that they’re anything other than straight, but hear me out — wouldn’t it have been FANTASTIC if after everything those two gals went through on both The Bachelor and The Bachelorette, they both said, “I’m ready for something new” and scissored off into the sunset? Can you imagine a more delicious way of saying “fuck you” to the male suitors who were on their worst reality TV behavior? I can’t. Also, Gabby could teach Rachel a thing or two about communication.


Drew, Writer

I’m trying to think of something really spicy and surprising but the fact is I’m pretty honest about my hot takes on a day-to-day basis. Like one thing I thought about is the first three seasons of The L Word had better trans representation than the first three seasons of The L Word: Generation Q. But would any regular Autostraddle readers really be surprised I have that take? Killing Eve’s final season was great, including the finale, is another hot take that I feel like I’ve already expressed on this site.

My only new take that would cause debate among the staff and our readers is probably that successful actors who sign up to play any sort of law enforcement role — especially on procedurals — in the year 2022 should be embarrassed. It’s one thing if you’re a queer actor who needs rent money and to build your resume. Like fine go on SVU that’s between you and your God. But if you’re famous?? It really, really sucks. And Autostraddle shouldn’t cover it when they do no matter how tempting — unless we’re being explicitly critical of the show and their involvement. That’s just my opinion! Sorry for interrupting the fun! I also think the second season of The White Lotus is way better than the first!


Nico, A+ and Fundraising Director

If I’m grading the (readily accessible, mainstream) horror/suspense/thriller movies and TV shows featuring queer people and queer sex that cis gay white men have put out this year on a curve, well, I think that Ryan Murphy actually is leading the class with an A on account of the latest season of American Horror Story — EVEN THOUGH it’s a season with super annoying Tarot scenes (they will be featured in a future article by me lol) and absolute buckets of copoganda (see Drew’s intelligent writing on the subject). Look, this is graded on a curve, but I couldn’t watch AHS Season 11 back to back with the latest season of The White Lotus (which I am defining as suspense due to the probably impending murder) and take Mike White saying he wanted to make “gay sex transgressive again” seriously.

My dude, my bud, my bro — spoilers I guess — but we all know what it means when you say someone is your “nephew” (or “niece”) while traveling. I don’t want boring queer suspense set in a hotel in Italy — for fucks sake let’s see something more depraved if we’re going to follow excruciatingly wealthy people around! We all know how I felt about They / Them. I don’t want boring queer horror set at a conversion camp where we do not exact revenge on straights! I want these gay men to stop being so infatuated with cops! I want our community to make it weird. I am not sure if Ryan Murphy is doing that or if he is not doing that — and that’s between me and my gods I guess, but I also want to just see more Joe Mantello in things! My hot take as a whole seems to be coalescing into something like: this season of AHS was deeply flawed, but I also really enjoyed a season centered on queers — and on Joe Mantello working in indie queer media of all things. I cackled when that came up.

It tickled me so damn much as Sandra Bernhard and co. basically outlined the thesis around Autostraddle’s creation (too much queer media centers cis gay men) and then stabbed Gino’s desk with a knife — if only we could go stab Ryan Murphy’s desk with a knife and demand that he tell us why he thinks BDSM gear is so spooky. I think that, much like Stephen King, Ryan Murphy actually does well (for him) when he creates characters who are writers, and I’d like to see more of it. It was my favorite part of the first half of last season (second half with the aliens was unwatchable), and it is notably one of the plot points in season 2’s arc with Sarah Paulson. I want him to lean into that because I imagine we are getting like 10 more seasons of AHS because no one can or is willing to fund any other gay horror showrunners but Ryan Murphy so we might as well make them all center queer people and all feature characters who are writers because those tend to be his best ones.


A.Tony, Writer

I have written seasons four through seven of Batwoman, which means there’s literally no excuse for The CW not to bring it back (aside from like, their obvious misogynoiristic homophobia — talking to networks at large here). Max deserved more in A League of Their Own, like even though it was really well done I will always demand more for black queer women, argue with your mama. I don’t know if they’re gay (I’ll go check I promise) but Kiki Layne deserved much better in Don’t Worry, Darling and I’m somehow still surprised that white women can definitely still get black women on the receiving end of violence onto their screen and then somehow think they can’t squeeze much else about them on there (okay, Olivia Wilde is bisexual and directed it, does that make this work? Am I also allowed to say this movie was literally Nicole Kidman’s Stepford Wives except we weren’t allowed to laugh at Glenn Close’s screaming because Christopher Walken’s head came off at the end?). It’s been amazing how networks cancel black lesbian/queer leads and think we don’t see a connection? Like First Kill, Batwoman, and Queens are examples that come to mind but I guess maybe they (networks/etc.) know we see it but they’re like what’re you gonna do about it? And I’m hoping writers somehow make more stories in defiance of being invisibilized. (Y’all, we should support more independent media by the way). Don’t hate me but Bodies, Bodies, Bodies made wish for more heterosexuality. I just refuse to believe the black lesbians move like that, I REFUSE.


Casey, Writer

Okay, don’t get me wrong, I ended up loving A League of Their Own (almost) just as much as the rest of you. (Shout-out to Lupe and Jess’s butch friendship and Clance, my favorite heterosexual character perhaps ever). But I really think their creative decision to write the dialogue without much of a semblance of historical accuracy was a mistake. Darcy of this very website even patiently explained to me on Twitter the reasons why writers and showrunners would do that (to not alienate contemporary viewers, especially young queer people; attempts at historical accuracy are often wrong even if they feel “old timey”). But I cannot get behind the decision for A League of Their Own.

People did not say someone had “mad packing knowledge” in the 40s!! It took me multiple episodes to adjust and, to be clear, I did adjust. But I went through the first few episodes having to shake my head and remind myself I was watching a new-to-me character named Carson, baseball player in the 1940s, not Abbi Jacobson’s alter ego on Broad City. Maybe it’s because I know Broad City so well (it’s one of my favorite shows). But the anachronistic dialogue — as well as the sometimes coinciding humor — consistently took me out of the storyline and reminded me that I was watching a show made in the 21st century about the 1940s. I want the show to make me feel like I’m right there, in the 1940s. The costuming and sets are so lovingly crafted to look like the 40s; why wouldn’t you do the same with the dialogue!! And the whole premise of the show, the women’s baseball league, is so specific to that time period.

The 1940s is not that far in the past, it’s not as if viewers in 2022 wouldn’t be able to parse some different slang or the lack of distinctly 21st century turns of phrase. I really would have loved to hear how women, Black people, and/or queer people spoke in that time, what they would have sounded like, what words they would have chosen given what was available to them. I don’t want queer people of the past to be flattened for 21st century viewers, to make them seem like they’re just like us. People had different conceptions of sexuality, gender, and race in the 1940s than they do today and it would have been so interesting to see it expressed in their language. Oh well. Please renew this show though Amazon!!


Natalie, Writer/TV Critic

So this isn’t so much a hot take — in fact, it’s a sentiment I’ve expressed on this site before — but in the spirit of the holigays, I hope you’ll indulge me with this rant.

Listen, I like straight people. Hell, I’ve even loved a few (we’ll save those stories for another roundtable). I’m far from being heterophobic: some of my best friends are straight. I’ve got straight people in my own family. And sometimes, when straight couples are on television, I don’t even fast-forward through their scenes. I pay attention…now, granted, most of the time I’m just waiting for them to realize they’re bisexual (ahem, Zhilan on Kung Fu)…but, on occasion, I even find myself cheering for them.

But this time, the straights have gone too g—damn far…and I’m not going to stand idly by and just accept it. These straight people will not tell me that Olivia Margaret Benson is in love with her former partner, Elliot Stabler, and has been in love with him this entire time. Nope, nope, nope…I will not tolerate this madness…not in 2022, not in the year of our Lord, Beyonce.

When I wrote about this in 2018, I thought we’d all come to an understanding: Olivia Benson was gay and Alex Cabot was the love her life. There was a mountain of evidence that suggested homosexuality was afoot, evidence far more compelling than whatever they’re citing now to suggest Elliot and Olivia are MFEO. Apparently, though, these TV writers prefer their copaganda, straight.

For years I tolerated the excuses — the don’t ask, don’t tell of it all — that sent Olivia from one failed relationship (with a man) to the next and just reveled in the subtext. But now we’re talking about Olivia Benson settling down…now we’re talking about forever…and it’s supposed to be with Stabler?! The show’s writers, with their straight agenda, brainwashing everyone into thinking they’re supposed to be endgame? Just stop it.

This is probably why Ilene Chaiken left. She’s probably as disgusted with these straights as I am.


Valerie Anne, Writer + Social Media Manager

My hot take is the same as Tracy’s hot take. Season one of Warrior Nun it made me actually angry, that people were touting the blink-and-you-miss-it confirmation of queerness as groundbreaking representation. Season two was admittedly better, but it still only passed the bare minimum requirements to even count as representation, and it sure wasn’t very groundbreaking. I’m not the kind of person who judges people for what they love, but to be like “Warrior Nun has the best representation of 2022” when actually it just barely squeaked by with any representation at all is just taking it too far for me. Love the show all you want, and feel free to project all your feelings to it, flesh out the story with fanfic, etc. But giving it more credit than it’s due: a) gives creators a pass (“Look, we barely had to make it gay at all and they’re eating it up”) and b) takes away from the real, complex, deep and detailed storylines other shows gave us.

Also “Kacy” and “Marina” are two of my favorite ships and two of my least favorite ship names. Future shippers, please for the love of the TV gods make your ship names something other than a word that sounds like a different woman’s name. #Whistara #Delishop #LoveTheShipHateTheShipName

against a black cyberspacey background crossed with laser-esque designs, the text readin g"Day 2" glows. Next to it is a little flame with a cute little face flickering. it's kind of cartoonish.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!

Heather Hogan

Heather Hogan is an Autostraddle senior editor who lives in New York City with her wife, Stacy, and their cackle of rescued pets. She's a member of the Television Critics Association, GALECA: The Society of LGBTQ Entertainment Critics, and a Rotten Tomatoes Tomatometer critic. You can also find her on Twitter and Instagram.

Heather has written 1718 articles for us.

the team

auto has written 771 articles for us.

25 Comments

  1. Fully agree with Casey’s hot take on ALoTO. I don’t think 40s vocab is so hard for modern audiences to understand. We’ve all seen older movies. They could have even just made the dialogue a little more neutral instead of so In Your Face contemporary. There are plenty of popular historical fiction movies that do that.

    I loved the show and the characters and i finally just accepted it, but the dialogue kept me from completely adoring it the way that I wanted to.

    (I saw complaints online about the anachronistic music, and that doesn’t bother me at all)

  2. Ro I ABSOLUTELY share the same take on Gabby and Rachel. Their chemistry and care for each other FAR exceeded any of the connections they made with men on the show.

    Casey – agree! Some of the very modern vocabulary initially made me wonder if the show was going to be the right fit for me and I was glad I stuck with it ultimately but it made me unsure of what the tone of the series might be – like more of a light, even flippant take was my main worry. Very glad to be proven wrong – man, that show had gravitas for days – but it did jar me at first.

    A. Tony – strongly agree re: DWD. Kiki’s character needed more time to let us know WTF was actually going on, and play up how sinister it actually was! I also think it was gratuitous for Olivia Wilde to cast herself in the role she did and then punt Gemma Chan into such a bit role. I think they should have swapped roles or given Gemma’s character more motivation/weight – things happened that I agreed with but the motivation was so unclear that it wasn’t actually satisfying!

  3. Omg I’m obsessed with the take on Gabby and Rachel. I was shipping them so hard as soon as it was announced they were doing dual bachelorettes. I wish we got more time with just the 2 of them!!!

  4. Thanks y’all for sharing the spicy takes!! So fun! Also CASEY thank you for perfectly articulating/summarizing how I feel about the ALoTO! 100% on point.

    • I am so glad ppl agree, I was starting to feel a little crazy when so many others unabashedly loved every aspect of the show.

  5. i’m with you @caseythecanadianlesbrarian, at the beginning that really bothered me! i think over time it became less bothersome. i think it could have easily turned into a caricature of the 1940s if they had leaned too much into the language of the time, especially with how detailed everything else was? i dunno. i also think that as time goes on and 2022 becomes old timey, the way some of these words and concepts are presented will be more closely aligned with how people in the future think and speak on them than they would have been with a 1940s way of talking about them.

    i also think think that abbi jacobson is who she is and no amount of old language is going to change her acting, lol

    • That’s a good point about it becoming a caricature! That would have bugged me too. Maybe as @serena said above, just being a little more neutral and omitting the obvious 2020sisms would have been a better route!

    • I think in addition to the caricature risk, there were two other big risks with making the dialogue more accurate to the 40s:
      1) not all of the actors would have pulled it off as well as each other, making some interactions painful to watch.
      2) it would have been MUCH less of a fun thing to watch if dialogue about queer people, women, and people of colour was accurate to the time. I’m particularly relieved to have respite from that in such an otherwise lovely escape from the grims this year.

      I get what you mean about taking the viewer out of the 1940s with the modern dialogue, but I like to think Abbi Jacobsen spared us the experience. The nightclub episode is a perfect example of how I think the writers interrupted any potential nostalgia younger viewers might be feeling about the 40s, reminding us we don’t want to go back there. Plus, I think it’s clever and honest to make it clear that this is a 2022 interpretation of the 40s. Even if I did feel like she was Abbi from Broad City sometimes!

  6. Y’all are brave on this day of all days to come out with that hot take on Warrior Nun – kudos to you – but funnily enough it was the fact that the show didn’t engage enough with the religious aspect that bugged me, not the representation. It’s possible to represent without sex, and a lot of people connected with them emotionally.

    I do think Autostraddle gives The L Word Gen Q too much of a free pass, so thanks Heather for your take. It’s AWFUL. Just awful, and it’s not just Tibette. The OGs have come nowhere, and the new characters are whiny, entitled and irritating. Why does the show with the most queer action have to be the most demeaning and irritating? Gotta tell you, seeing that episode from Gen Q up there in the top 10 lesbian TV episodes for the year just made me shake my head in despair. So much amazing stuff out there, and The L Word always skates by. Frustrating.

  7. omg I love these hot takes, and wish er had a weekly hot take roundtable bc my gemini self loves the drama. I’m pleasantly surprised that anyone has any negative opinions about ALoTO!!! I also didn’t like the modern language, and I… was really, really, really irritated by Carson the whole season long and never got over my intense dislike of her character. Also, I love Warrior Nun but completely agree that it should get no points for like.. how gay it is? I love it basically because it is a hot mess, distinctly European in its mix of languages and locations, and because I love how weirdly Catholic it is. Sorry to anyone who wants to watch it for some cute romantic lesbians (and also as Heather wrote about… there are some truly horrible ableist tropes going on). Also Drew’s hot take about cop shows!!!! Heart eyes!!!!

  8. Love all these! Couldn’t agree more about Tibette – and maybe it’s just me watching it years later, but I don’t think they even have that much chemistry? Maybe I just feel that way bc it always seemed like they straight up hated each other for the majority of their relationship, haha. I sometimes wonder if something’s wrong with me bc I don’t see their appeal – glad someone else agrees!

  9. Hot take:
    Inside Man (I think it was called) was so awful aaaand offensive that I’m going to hold a grudge against Stanley Tucci and reversing my special place I hold for everyone who was in It Could Happen To You!

  10. Hot take:
    If Tibette weren’t sticking around, theres no reason for Angie to mingle with the main cast. No matter that she’s better than all the other characters, it was obvious they would set her up in an imbalanced power/age relationship in order to find a way to inch her closer to the gen z cohort. They did her wrong!

  11. My hot take is that I really resent Yellowjackets for getting so much more coverage than The Wilds on this site! Is that ok to say?!

    I know s2 of The Wilds shifted focus to “the boys”, but I thought the character development of the girls/women in s1 was SO powerful, particularly for the queer characters, and that quality continued when the girls/women had scenes in s2. I was hungry for more – the boys definitely got in the way (and are DEFINITELY why the show was cancelled). AAAAnd this is speculation but the chemistry between the actors playing Toni/Shelby was off the charts…I really hope they got some nice times together out of being coworkers :) And I wish it hadn’t been cancelled so we could get more scenes with them!!

    Yellowjackets…felt both bonkers (not in a fun way) and somehow way more centered around the boys/men in the girls/women’s lives than The Wilds was. I was rolling my eyes at the big reveal in the last episode – like ok yes, it’s cool that we have a horror show where women get to be the unhinged ones (I guess) but the whole dramatic reveal is centered around what’s basically a sexual assault for shock value? Why are we doing THAT in 2022?

    I guess it’s good that Yellowjackets DIDN’T get cancelled because I do appreciate the Van/Taissa storyline and want to see where it goes (sort of; adult Taissa didn’t do it for me at all). It’s better to have some queer survival/horror rep than none at all. But I’m pretty skeptical of if I’ll enjoy s2 and be able to keep watching…The characters deserved better writing. The whole thing felt much more male gaze-y than The Wilds ever did.

    That’s my vent! Thank you for your time.

  12. “But I went through the first few episodes having to shake my head and remind myself I was watching a new-to-me character named Carson, baseball player in the 1940s, not Abbi Jacobson’s alter ego on Broad City.”

    Yes!! Absolutely. And I actually think it was Abbi Jacobson’s limitations as an actor that were the problem and made her feel like a 2020s character, and that was just compounded by the dialogue, because I don’t remember finding the dialogue distracting with other characters. Like Sa’iyda said above, Abbi is who she is. So I wish she could have written and co-created the show without starring in it, because I just don’t think she was the right choice for the role, unfortunately.

    And the anachronistic music choices didn’t bother me at all!

  13. Here for all the takedowns of copaganda, thank you!

    And I couldn’t get through the first 10 minutes of Warrior Nun.

  14. this was lovely! Heather, Tibette was funnily also my first exposure to anything lesbian (besides gay poetry lol) but I really really didnt like The L Word. I think what really was extremely important to me was Orange is the new Black. I’m 26 and I got Netflix because of that series and when I saw the teaser with Alex and Piper in the shower I was like, omg. this made me reflect on how different queer pieces of media leave their mark and this reminded me of a conversation I had recently with an only slightly younger queer person and how different our first queer media experiences were despite only so little time between us! Like, I talked to him about how watching The L Word sex scenes and weird 90s movies and Mädchen in Uniform on YouTube was my first queer representation and how OITNB was revolutionary for me, and then this (really only slightly younger) person goes: “yes, X told me how it was back then and how little representation you had! As I came out just recently and there’s so much representation, I can’t imagine what that must have been like!” and I was like…wow, I’m only 26! and it made me just so emotional, like, so happy and touched by Gen Z and the immense progress that has been made in the last decade, but also, just, sad for babygay me who limited herself to L Word sex scenes and rooting for Thomas Barrow in Downton Abbey (still upset there were no lesbians in that show).

    • I’m 30, didn’t come out till around 20/21, so OITNB was my first real queer TV too! I didn’t go back and watch the L Word until several years later.
      I remember with OITNB also just being so excited to watch a TV show centered around women!

  15. Fully agree on the WN hot takes. I don’t know if I have call it slow burn. It went from nothing in season 1 to something totally different in 2 and a crumb in the end.

    I can see how it’s enjoyable but far from being great representation (not this year not in general) or even call it a good relationship story.

  16. I feel a bit awkward but I honestly haven’t really paid much attention to the television side of LGBTQ+ TV & Film in 2022 and what most find intriguing, what’s deemed popular hasn’t really appealed to me.

    Film, though? Yeah that’s more my style. And it’s been wonderful to see such an increase in films aimed for the younger adults of our community, for sure. Even it it’s come at the detriment of films aimed towards an older audience, like myself.

    That being said, there’s one film that I’m absolutely in love with and would absolutely promote to anyone who’d listen. Walk With Me. It might not have had the best budget and it is certainly along the vein of arthouse, but it’s a sweet story about finding yourself and accepting love.

    TV is great. I am all for all the representation and queer love! I just can’t stop looking out for the next great WLW love story to grace my screen!

Comments are closed.