‘My Old Ass’ Tells an Original Bisexual Coming-of-Age Tale — but Does It Do It Well?

Megan Park’s My Old Ass could have been a delightful and unique addition to the queer coming-of-age genre. During her last summer at home before going to college, Elliot (Maisy Stella) meets her 39-year-old self (Aubrey Plaza) while doing shrooms. Older Elliot’s advice to Young Elliott comes twofold: Spend more time with your family, and avoid a guy named Chad. Needless to say, Elliot does not take the latter part of the advice, embarking on a teenage summer romance with Chad, a boy working at her family’s cranberry farm.

The premise itself is a fascinating exploration of one’s inner child: What would you say to your younger self if you could give them advice on anything? And would your younger self even listen? Watching Stella and Plaza riff off one another as the same character ages apart was delightful. The humorous chemistry between them is palpable, and enjoyable to watch. However, what begins as a promising tale of exploring love and queerness, and the joy and fear inherent to the passage of time, ultimately falls short of expectation.

Elliott’s coming out story is unique in terms of cinematic representation. She begins the film a confident lesbian, bragging about having slept with many women including another girl at camp (who we see maybe twice, and who lacks any depth to her character). However, when she meets Chad, she realizes she is falling for him, which is completely outside of her other sexual and romantic experiences. Taking this approach to the character’s queer journey is not the issue for me—it is an underrepresented portrayal, and a reality for plenty of young bisexual/pansexual girls (and boys and non-binary teens).

The issue for me is that until over halfway through the movie it seems like Elliott’s queerness is an innate, but innocuous, aspect of her character. I was thrilled that her bisexuality was obvious, but not made a plot point in a typical tragicomic fashion of many coming out films. I thought it fresh and exciting to see this premise with a queer character without the queer part being what brings the conflict to the relationship and the plot. When I was revealed to be wrong, it didn’t come as a shock to discover that Elliott previously didn’t identify as bisexual — her crude vocabulary and baggy shorts scream “teenage fuckboy lesbian” — but it did come as a disappointment. Disappointment, that is, in unclear, sloppy storytelling. Sure, I could take the visual cues from her characterization, but a masculine-dressed girl does not a lesbian always make. [Insert photos of me from high school.]

While I find the idea of documenting a young girl’s journey into her bisexuality as a refreshing, exciting exploration, the poor storytelling and narrative structure of the film left me with some concerns. For some viewers — especially those who do not identify as LGBTQ+ — the story could be seen as the narrative of a young lesbian “just finding the right guy.” There is a scene between Elliott and a friend of hers named Ro (Kerrice Brooks) in which Ro validates Elliott’s queerness as a malleable force that is allowed to explore itself and change, but the scene is so quick and muddled with Gen Z slang that it feels like an afterthought. Older Elliott does mention smoking her girlfriend’s weed at one point, but the comment is very quick and could be easily missed, or forgotten. There is also an uncertainty in Elliott regarding her attraction to women, where she finds herself distanced from those experiences and unsure of what she “really wants.” Cue Chad, a cisgender heterosexual man (Percy Hynes White, whose allegations of sexual assault and racist tweets also left a bad taste in my mouth when Googling him after this film). The setup for this relationship can greatly imply to the untrained viewer that Elliott’s lesbianism is a folly of teenagehood, and her first love being with Chad an indication that she has come back around to men. Again, what could be an energizing representation of bisexuality/pansexuality, instead through clunky storytelling comes across as lesbophobic.

Outside of its takes on sexuality, the execution of the story itself is rather bland, which is disappointing considering the fascinating intention. Older Elliott tells her younger self to cherish her family, and Younger Elliott listens. There’s no true conflict, no sense that Elliott is actually learning anything. The stakes therefore feel low or nonexistent. And in falling for Chad, her older self is scarcely to be seen to give more advice, and so again Younger Elliott’s decisions feel hollow, and without much weight behind them. There’s no true conflict in the story, and all of the emotional beats feel less like gut punches than reading the outline of a script yet to be written in full. I noticed which moments were meant to make me feel sad, angry, happy, but I didn’t actually feel any of those emotions. In one such scene, it is revealed to Elliott by her younger brother that her parents are selling the cranberry farm they have had for generations, and didn’t think to tell her because they didn’t think she would care. But, from the beginning of the movie, Elliott is very involved in her family’s life at the request of her older self, and so we don’t witness any of the actual conflict of her detachment, and therefore the reveal that should hit us as viewers as deeply impactful falls flat.

This similarly happens with the reveal of why Older Elliot wants Younger Elliot to avoid Chad. As a viewer, I knew this was meant to be a gut punch. But instead, I rolled my eyes. It felt like a copout — what is an easy way to hit the “drama button” for a movie? The moment feels cheap, especially considering the story up to this point has not earned our emotional involvement.

While the intent of the film — to show our older selves that the choices we make are inherent to our humanity, and should not be sought to be changed unless we change who we are — is beautiful, the execution is at best sloppy. While Stella and Plaza’s chemistry and individual performances were quite enjoyable, the film itself is a miss for me. If I could talk to my younger self, I’d tell her to skip it.


My Old Ass is now in theatres.

Before you go! Autostraddle runs on the reader support of our AF+ Members. If this article meant something to you today — if it informed you or made you smile or feel seen, will you consider joining AF and supporting the people who make this queer media site possible?

Join AF+!
Related:

Gabrielle Grace Hogan

Gabrielle Grace Hogan (she/her) received her MFA from the University of Texas at Austin. Her poetry has been published by TriQuarterly, CutBank, Salt Hill, and others, and has been supported by the James A. Michener Fellowship and the Ragdale Foundation. In the past, she has served as Poetry Editor of Bat City Review, and as Co-Founder/Co-Editor of You Flower / You Feast, an anthology of work inspired by Harry Styles. She lives in Austin, Texas. You can find her on Instagram @gabriellegracehogan, her website www.gabriellegracehogan.com, or wandering a gay bar looking lost.

Gabrielle has written 21 articles for us.

11 Comments

    • I really enjoyed the movie. I agree parts of her sexuality were underwritten, but this wasn’t a coming out movie and those themes seemed entirely incidental to the main theme, which was more about nostalgia and coming of age and those moments when our life shifts in ways that turn the reality we took for granted into a nostalgic memory. I found it very moving.

      (and Elliot is supposed to be Gen Z teen in 2024 so I found the Gen Z slang apt – it felt like they were writing an actual Gen Z character, not millennials or Gen X writing their memory of what teenagers are like).

    • It’s not underrepresented when the implication is that the character is straight, but it’s absolutely underrepresented when the character’s bisexuality is respected as a part of her.

      And, in terms of this movie, an out lesbian teen character realizing she’s actually bisexual is not common. Although I agree with Gabbie it could’ve been done better and with more nuance here.

    • I understand this take, but in case anyone out there is deciding if they watch this movie or not based off this review: I just want to say I felt the exact opposite way. As a gay person, I wasn’t disappointed with her liking a guy – it felt like an authentic journey. I felt the film transported me back to what it’s like to be 18. That made me feel the push/pull of independence vs family Elliott was struggling with. And the growth and the ending felt earned. I was blown away with both Aubrey and Maisy’s acting. I really liked it!

      I totally understand this review’s perspective, but hopefully this comment makes a couple of people think about maybe still watching it.

  1. I didn’t think that Chad was a straight cis boy, I thought the movie was showing her and Chad exploring their genders/ transness (most explicitly in the Justin Bieber fantasy) without making it explicit and inevitably making that the focus of the film. I’m non-binary, and my non- binary friend who watched it separately had the same conclusion. I actually came to Autostraddle to see if you’d reviewed it because I thought that if anyone touched on this, it would be you guys! Wondering if anyone else had this take?

  2. I agree with the comment that the Justin Bieber fantasy shows both Chad and Elliott exploring their genders. That was something my friend and I both noticed.
    As for your take on Aubrey’s Elliott’s comment of having a girlfriend in the future was quick and easy to miss, yet, an overwhelming majority of reviewers/commenters caught that, as did I, so I wouldn’t be so fast as to dismiss the importance of that line in the movie.
    Another thing you commented on was how you didn’t noticed the distance between Elliott and her family, which made it feel like she didn’t learn anything. But at the beginning you see she doesn’t show up for her own family celebration (they made a cake) and the mom states nobody knew she’d be gone. And during the mushroom trip both Elliotts talk about the family, Young Elliott ignoring a call and making it clear she’s interested in spending time getting to know the mom and her brothers.
    It was a shorter indie type film but, it seems like you maybe just didn’t pick up on all the nuances? And for what it’s worth, I’m 41yo and I had no issues following the “gen z riddled” conversation between her an Ro.

  3. Similar to Taylor’s comment above – I really enjoyed the movie and didn’t feel at all like it came across as a story of a confused queer woman “just finding the right guy.” Besides the mention of old Elliott’s girlfriend towards the end noted in the review, right at the beginning when old Elliott is trying to convince young Elliott she’s her from the future: “Left boob, one cup smaller than the right. And no, it never catches up to the right, but honestly, you get used to it and it’s okay. Guys can’t really tell. Girls can, but *shrug*.” This dialog occurs within the first 10 minutes, and I took it as very explicitly telling the viewer that “this person dates/hooks up with multiple genders throughout their lifetime.” This actually muddied the plot for me in the opposite direction, where I didn’t realize that Elliott was struggling with her feelings for Chad in relation to her queerness until the convo with Ro.

  4. This review feels like you’re just mad that she didn’t remain a lesbian. Every single lesbian community I’ve seen online complains about this film but every bisexual community online I’ve seen praises it. Hmm, I wonder why that might be…

    • I felt the same way as the author. It felt like all the other movies where Bi girls end up with men. Which is a troubling pattern in rl, so it needs to be handled with more critical thought then this film did.

Contribute to the conversation...

Yay! You've decided to leave a comment. That's fantastic. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated by the guidelines laid out in our comment policy. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation and thanks for stopping by!